It’s going to be a stain on Jewish and Israeli history for generations to come

Public outcry following the sudden and unexpected July 4th flooding of Kerr County, Texas  has finally nudged the government watchdogs into  publicly using the phrase geoengineering

Lee Zeldin,  the EPA Administrator, strong statement on geoengineering      sounds like it will  finally bring the government’s awareness of the subject up to the level of the normal citizen.

I’m not buying it.  Government and those they work for have been geoengineering for decades.

From https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2000/nsb00215/nsb50/preface.html

The relationship between the Board and the Foundation is distinct among government research agencies. Indeed, the Board’s second Chair, Chester Barnard, president of the Rockefeller Foundation, used to refer to the Board as “this peculiar organization.” The singular partnership between the Board and the Foundation has been largely responsible for creating in the United States what is the world’s most vibrant and fruitful research environment.

The National Science Foundation published the book on  Weather and Climate Modification in 1965. It’s found in it’s entirety in the previous post. The CIA  had their own history of involvement documents  declassified more than twenty years ago, yet government officials still mislead US.

Less than a year ago The World Economic Forum  announced…

On 22 October 2024, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) released its Ethical Framework Principles for Climate Intervention Research as a guide to responsible decision-making and inclusive dialogue about geoengineering research…

Have you heard about those plans, yet? Here’s a heads up:

Climate intervention research requires guidance at local, regional, and global levels. AGU, in conjunction with a global panel of experts, has facilitated the development of Ethical Framework Principles for Climate Intervention Research, which provides guidance for ensuring: 1. Responsible research, 2. Climate justice, 3. Inclusive public participation, 4. Transparency, and 5. Informed governance.

You think that sounds friendly?

Don’t take anything they say as the final word. They got plans we ain’t even heard, yet. When we work through their misdirection we end up with ‘conspiracy theories’ to figure out that they end up agreeing with twenty or so years later.

If what they’re selling stinks to you trust your built in stink-o-meter. Not their half step shuffle to perdition announcement using the old re-worked Socialist terms only fools and tools would trust.

After the recently reported National flooding disasters I went looking for a weather post published here using the phrase ‘making weather pay‘. I did that because in the past many people were still thinking ‘conspiracy theory’ when a controlled weather discussion started but lately, folks appear to be taking a second look at these out of nowhere storms and their arguments appear to be less contentious.

I wish I learned of the National Science Foundation’s account long ago; and for the people in charge of our Country who refused to acknowledge the reality of weather and climate manipulation, who misled millions of Americans regarding it’s existence, I have another question. What other issues have you misled US citizens? Aside from the vaxx massacre?

Here are the listed contents of the National Science Foundation’s 1965 report on

WEATHER AND CLIMATE MODIFICATION

https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/1965/nsb1265.pdf

SPECIAL COMMISSION ON WEATHER MOIJIFICATION NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ………………………… iii

SPECIAL COMMISSION ON WEATHER MODIFICATION iv

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ……………………….1

SUMMARY………………………………………7

Introduction …………………………………. 7

Scientific Possibilities ………………………….11

Biological Implications …………………………. 18

The Social Effects ……………………………….20

TheLaw ……………………………………. 23

Needs and Opportunities for International Cooperation … 26

Fiscal and Organizational Considerations ……………29

PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS IN WEATHER AND CLiMATE MODIFICATION ………………………………34

Introduction ……………………………… 34

The Nature of the Scientific Problem …………… 34

Present Status of Weather Modification …………. 38

Accomplishments of the National Science Foundation Program …………………………….. 43

Activities in Foreign Countries ……………….. 47

Perspectives for Research …………………… 50

Conclusions and Recommendations ……………. 58

BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF WEATHER MODIFICATION ….. 60

Introduction ……………………………… 60

Means of Predicting Consequences of Weather Modification ……………………………..60

Predicted Biological Responses of Weather Modification…………………………………..65

Conclusions and Recommendations of The Ecological Society Working Group …………………69

STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF WEATHER MODIFICATION …. 71

The Present Situation …………………….71

The Conferences on Statistical Methodology ……..71

Conference Findings ……………………… 72

Conference Recommendations ………………. 73

Precipitation-Oriented Experiments …………… 74

The Empirical Approach ……………………. 75

Numerical Modeling and Simulation …………… 76

Commission Recommendations ………………. 77

Footnote ……………………………….. 79

THE HUMAN EFFECTS OF WEATHER AND CLIMATE MODIFICATION ……………………………. 80

WEATHER MODIFICATION AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

International Programs Related to Weather Modifications

Four Interlocking Systems ………………….. 82

Uncertainty …………………………… 84

Two Approaches to the Human Dimensions …….. 85

Broader Considerations ………………… 85

Evaluating Social Effects …………………. 86

Conflicts of Interest ……………………….. 90

Desirable Courses of Action …………………. 92

Recommendations ………………………… 97

Footnotes……………………………….. 98

LEGAL AND LEGISLATIVE ASPECTS …………………100

WEATHER MODIFICATION AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS………………………… 113

International Programs Related to Weather Modification…… 115