Category Archives: Uncategorized

Justice Democrats… From Whence They Have Arisen

..The organization formed as a result of the 2016 United States presidential election and has a stated goal of reforming the Democratic Party by running “a unified campaign to replace every corporate-backed member of Congress” and rebuild the Democratic Party from “scratch” starting in the 2018 congressional midterm elections.[5][6]…

That was from a Wikipedia look into the latest communist effort to put lipstick on the globalist pig that drags them through the sty they earnestly believe is theirs to control; at least until the speck they see themselves as disintegrates into particles of the void they believe awaits.

Sanders Hires Arturo Carmona of Presente.org for Latino Outreach

Updated Oct. 2, 2015, 5:15 PM EDT

By Suzanne Gamboa

From https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/sanders-hires-arturo-carmona-presente-org-latino-outreach-n437836

Democrat Bernie Sanders, who still faces a long road for recognition and support in the Latino community, has hired a Latino Outreach director for the campaign.

Sanders, a Vermont senator, hired Arturo Carmona, executive director of Presente.org, a Latino advocacy group based in Los Angeles. Carmona also will serve as Southwest political director. The group, which is largely an online group, is considered more left than other more established Latino organizations…

As an activist on civil rights, Carmona, 37, said he never saw himself joining a political campaign, but “when I saw the political campaign and Sen. Sanders calling for a political revolution and people from all walks of life joining this movement, I said ‘Hey, this is something I’ve seen that can make a difference.’ I decided to join because I see a great need,” he said…

From https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/23/us/politics/justice-democrats-ocasio-cortez.html

It takes movements like ours to push parties to prioritize what the base wants and what the values of the party are,” Mr. Shahid said. “That is the role of our movement, to give a policy vision for this country to a party that often lacks a clear policy vision.”

Mr. Shahid, Mr. McElwee and their allies argue that they do not need long-game patience. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Representative Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ms. Omar, all Justice Democrats candidates, have already pushed strong climate change measures, higher taxes on the wealthy and support for a Palestinian state into the mainstream debate surrounding Democratic ideals…

…“We can’t have a 15-year power-building strategy,” Mr. McElwee said. “We have to have power now. We have to have it next election.”...

From https://cis.org/Report/Immigration-Policy-and-Politics-Bernie-Sanders

“Let me be very honest with you. I come from a state, the state of Vermont, [and] it’s a small state. There aren’t a lot of Latino people,” Sanders told reporters after speaking at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s annual Public Policy Conference. “What we are trying very, very hard to do — you are going to see us moving very aggressively in that area — is introduce myself to the Latino community. I will fight for every vote I can get in the Latino community.”14…

From their own video Before Alexandria Was Known As AOC, There Was A Movement That Recruited Her To Run

President Trump, what do you have to say about that?

“America will never be a socialist country.”

It looked as if even Nancy Pelosi approved the President there for a minute. Could it be the democrat organization is beginning to recognize it is in dire need of parental guidance?

The Devil’s In the Details

Rick Moran asks in https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/02/state_power_now_being_used_to_force_parents_to_transgender_their_kids__or_else.html

…How have we descended so far down into the rabbit hole so quickly when there is no scientific evidence to buttress the arguments of transgender activists and their allies in the judicial system? How can parents be allowed to determine the gender of their child? How can they be punished for refusing to accept this nonsense?…

The problem with the answer he provides in his following paragraph is it is false and in it’s falsity it is too easy to accept. Does he really think LGBTQ activists have that kind of power? Or does he think we think they have that kind of power?

There is power involved but like every dark turn our Country takes the power behind the vile attack on the American family is the Democrat leadership.

The Clintons specifically in this case and it was preventable.

Back in the 1990’s there were some big stories… Princess Diana’s death, OJ and Y2K but none of them bigger than the on-fire financial market or the Clinton impeachment.

The not so funny thing about the impeachment was Clinton’s ratings. From https://news.gallup.com/poll/4609/presidential-job-approval-bill-clintons-high-ratings-midst.aspx

6.Bill Clinton’s average job approval rating for 1998 was 5.7 points above that of the previous year, 1997, which in turn was higher than that of any of the four years which preceded it.

The impeachment story should have left America with at least a sense of the Clinton’s criminal propensity which should have prompted a one and done term limit for them but by golly, general consensus was greedily looking the other way.

The U.S.A. re-elected the UNindicted crime family and the cost of that was heavier than anyone ever thought possible. People still vote democrat so they haven’t yet figured it out.

Maybe a comparison of how good and evil works will help those who hate President Trump and his supporters get a better understanding of what’s at risk.

Back on September 2, 1987 President Reagan issued Executive Order 12607 he titled “The Family”.

In it he outlined requirements to be met in order to ensure that the autonomy and rights of the family are considered in the formulation and implementation of policies by Executive departments and agencies. Those rules were:

(a) Does this action by government strengthen or erode the stability of the family and, particularly, the marital commitment?

(b) Does this action strengthen or erode the authority and rights of parents in the education, nurture, and supervision of their children?

(c) Does this action help the family perform its functions, or does it substitute governmental activity for the function?

(d) Does this action by government increase or decrease family earnings? Do the proposed benefits of this action justify the impact on the family budget?

(e) Can this activity be carried out by a lower level of government or by the family itself?

(f) What message, intended or otherwise, does this program send to the public concerning the status of the family?

(g) What message does it send to young people concerning the relationship between their behavior, their personal responsibility, and the norms of our society?

The last sentence of EO 12607 read, This Order is intended to improve the internal management of the Executive branch and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.

Almost ten years later, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 13045 entitled, “Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks”.

In it he ordered:

Section 1. Policy.

1-101. A growing body of scientific knowledge demonstrates that children may suffer disproportionately from environmental health risks and safety risks. These risks arise because: children’s neurological immuno- logical, digestive, and other bodily systems are still developing; children eat more food, drink more fluids, and breathe more air in proportion to their body weight than adults; children’s size and weight may diminish their protection from standard safety features; and children’s behavior patterns may make them more susceptible to accidents because they are less able to protect themselves. Therefore, to the extent permitted by law and appropriate, and consistent with the agency’s mission, each Federal agency:

(a) shall make it a high priority to identify and assess environmental health risks and safety risks that may disproportionately affect children; and

(b) shall ensure that its policies, programs, activities, and standards address disproportionate risks to children that result from environmental health risks or safety risks.

1-102. Each independent regulatory agency is encouraged to participate in the implementation of this order and comply with its provisions.

Sec. 2. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to this order.

2-201. “Federal agency” means any authority of the United States blah blah blah

2-202. “Covered regulatory action” means any substantive action in a rulemaking, initiated after the date of this order or blah blah blah

(a) be “economically significant” under Executive Order 12866 (a rulemaking that has an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or would adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, blah blah blah

(b) concern an environmental health risk or safety risk that an agency has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children.

2-203. “Environmental health risks and safety risks” mean risks to health or to safety that are attributable to products or substances that the child is likely to come in contact blah blah blah

Sec. 3. Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children.

3-301. There is hereby established the Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children (“Task Force”).

3-302. The Task Force will report to the President in consultation with the Domestic Policy Council, the National Science and Technology Council, the Council on Environmental Quality, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

3-303. Membership. The Task Force shall be composed of the:

(a) Secretary of Health and Human Services, who shall serve as a Co-Chair of the Council;

(b) Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, who shall serve as a Co-Chair of the Council;

(c) Secretary of Education;

(d) Secretary of Labor;

(e) Attorney General;

(f) Secretary of Energy;

(g) Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;

(h) Secretary of Agriculture;

(i) Secretary of Transportation;

(j) Director of the Office of Management and Budget;

(k) Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality;

(l) Chair of the Consumer Product Safety Commission;

(m) Assistant to the President for Economic Policy;

(n) Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy;

(o) Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy;

(p) Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers; and

(q) Such other officials of executive departments and agencies as the President may, from time to time, designate.

Members of the Task Force may delegate their responsibilities under this order to subordinates.

3-304. Functions. The Task Force shall recommend to the President Federal strategies for children’s environmental health and safety, within the limits of the Administration’s budget, to include the following elements:

(a) statements of principles, general policy,

(b) a coordinated research agenda for the Federal Government, including steps to implement the review of research databases blah blah blah

(c) recommendations for appropriate partnerships among Federal, State, local, and tribal governments blah blah blah

(d) proposals to enhance public outreach and communication to assist families in evaluating risks to children blah blah blah

(e) an identification of high-priority initiatives that the Federal Government has undertaken or will undertake in advancing protection of children’s blah blah blah

(f) a statement regarding the desirability of new legislation to fulfill or promote the purposes of this order.

3-305. The Task Force shall prepare a biennial report on research, data, or other information that would enhance our ability to understand, analyze, and respond to environmental health risks and safety risks to children. For purposes of this report, cabinet agencies and other agencies identified by the Task Force shall identify and specifically describe for the Task Force key data needs related to environmental health risks and safety risks to children that have arisen in the course of the agency’s programs and activities. The Task Force shall incorporate agency submissions into its report and ensure that this report is publicly available and widely disseminated. The Office of Science and Technology Policy and the National Science and Technology Council shall ensure that this report is fully considered in establishing research priorities.

3-306. The Task Force shall exist for a period of 4 years from the first meeting. At least 6 months prior to the expiration of that period, the member agencies shall assess the need for continuation of the Task Force or its functions, and make appropriate recommendations to the President.

Sec. 4. Research Coordination and Integration.

4-401. Within 6 months of the date of this order, the Task Force shall develop or direct to be developed a review of existing and planned data resources and a proposed plan for ensuring that researchers and Federal research agencies have access to information on all research conducted or funded by the Federal Government that is related to adverse health risks in children resulting from exposure to environmental health risks or safety risks. The National Science and Technology Council shall review the plan.

4-402. The plan shall promote the sharing of information on academic and private research. It shall include recommendations to encourage that such data, to the extent permitted by law, is available to the public, the scientific and academic communities, and all Federal agencies.

Sec. 5. Agency Environmental Health Risk or Safety Risk Regulations.

5-501. For each covered regulatory action submitted to OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review pursuant to Executive Order 12866, the issuing agency shall provide to OIRA the following information developed blah blah blah

(a) an evaluation of the environmental health or safety effects of the planned regulation on children; and

(b) an explanation of why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the agency.

5-502. In emergency situations, or when an agency is obligated by law to act more quickly than normal review procedures allow, the agency shall comply with the provisions of this section to the extent practicable. For those covered regulatory actions that are governed by a court-imposed or statutory deadline, the agency shall, to the extent practicable, schedule any rulemaking proceedings so as to permit sufficient time for completing the analysis required blah blah blah

The last line…

7-702. Executive Order 12606 of September 2, 1987 is revoked.

If you think the democrat party and their quisling republican cohorts have your best interests in mind, if you don’t understand why the global elite’s moles are taking a stand against a President who is defending the safety and well-being of the American people when they (the moles) never made an effort to stop the criminal Clinton Executive Order wars you ought to ask yourself how much deeper into Third World perdition you are willing to let them take you before you accept delivery of understanding.

Easy answers from hand wringing social media commentators are not providing a path out of the real danger we are facing. Not knowing how far down the rabbit hole we are is a terrible acknowledgement. Not knowing how we got there is a portent of disaster for a nation that is supposed to be free. For all the sacrifices Americans believe they made in defense of our Country we should be able to smell the tyranny the democrats are constantly working to replace our Republic with.

Do you think the tyranny is going to stop if they successfully overthrow the President?

If you are unable to see the difference between the words of Ronald Reagan and the out of the can totalitarian edict of the Clinton’s that replaced them you deserve what is coming. Hurry to get your place in any welcoming city in any sanctuary state you find most comfortable.

Your mind has already found a place in the Gulag of Fools.

I Thought the Clintons Invented Pay-to-Play

Here is a list of evidence that supports that allegation. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/24/clintons-top-10-pay-play-allegations/.

And that doesn’t include the BnB Lincoln bed room specials.

https://observer.com/2016/09/wikileaks-guccifer-2-0-obama-sold-off-public-offices-to-donors/. Corruption doesn’t start or end with Hillary.

Hey, that’s public record and she still got millions of votes.

The only time pay-for-play didn’t work for a democrat was when this guy turned down Obama; he’s still in prison.

In November, Mr. Blagojevich asserted to an adviser, the affidavit says, that he knew whom Mr. Obama wanted named as his successor — described in the affidavit as Senate Candidate 1, a reference apparently to Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to Mr. Obama — but cursed him in apparent frustration that “they’re not willing to give me anything except appreciation.”

Here’s a news story rich with extorted irony. https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/27894-fbi-investigating-clinton-foundation-pay-for-play-scheme.

From that story ..In one flagrant example, the Crown Prince of Bahrain was forced to go through the Clinton Foundation to get access to the secretary of state. He got it after pledging $32 million to the Clinton Global Initiative….

If I was a registered democrat I wouldn’t be ragging too loudly on President Trump. The charges their party is trying to hang on the President somehow keep sticking to them.

Like flies on flypaper.

New Mexico Citizens Seek Governor’s Removal

KRQE reports 19,000 signatures

From https://www.krqe.com/news/politics-governement/petition-to-impeach-governor-gets-tens-of-thousands-of-signatures-/1774067893

To the Honorable Legislators of the state of New Mexico,

In accordance with the Constitution of the state of New Mexico, Article II Bill of Rights, Section 16;
◦Treason against the state shall consist only in levying war against it, adhering to its enemies, or giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

To be sure, there’s no colloquial misuse of a legal term:

The term “treason” as defined in this context “enemies,” for example, must be countries against which Congress has formally declared war or otherwise authorized the use of force.

To be sure, there’s no colloquial misuse of a legal term:

The term “enemy”, as defined in this context means;
◦A person who is actively opposed or hostile to someone or something.
◦ A hostile nation or its armed forces or citizens..
◦ A thing that harms or weakens something else

The President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, has “authorized the use of force” by deploying the National Guard to the southern borders of New Mexico as to protect its citizens from illegal entry and or illegal activities of our enemies. The governor of the state of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, has overruled this authorization of the President and ordered the removal of the National Guard. By doing so, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham has deliberately and recklessly aided our enemies in illegal entry to the state, committing illegal activities and endangering the safety of its citizens.

Therefore, by this reason, let we the people of the State of New Mexico bear witness and decree that Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham be impeached from office on grounds of Treason and we affirm this decree by signing of this petition.

This liberal twit said…

When KRQE reported this Monday, it said more than 19,000 people had signed Daniel’s petition. The last I checked, on Thursday morning, that number had more than doubled to over 44,000.

Boy, that’s a lot of people for Lincoln County.

That condescending brainiac should look up the definition of bellwether so when he finally does hear it he’ll know enough to get out of the way of angry America.

Regarding Fence Opposition

Ponder on why all these known and acknowledged deep state open borders One World devotees https://games-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/f5bbafbb-eabd-41d9-8cab-740fd515e8a7/note/c577ad48-4895-429e-b167-ef751cd37325.pdf do not recognize the emergency that we see every day.

The deep state gangsters must be insane. They have jumped the shark regarding evil. The American people elected Donald Trump president to clean up the stain the political gangsters left behind. We support President Trump’s plan to secure the border.

This is from Luke Rosiak’s Obstruction of Justice. It’s time frame is after Awan walks away from the federal trial with barely a wrist slap…

Imran claims he has job offers to return to Capitol Hill. Congressional chiefs of staff like Shelley Davis of Yvette Clarke’s office have not been charged with procurement fraud. Members of Congress who seemed to know of problems before authorities did but didn’t step up, like Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, were poised to ascend to the Senate and the governor’s mansion, respectively. Xaviar Becerra was now attorney general of California and a potential future presidential candidate. Another Awan employer, Hakeem Jeffries, would go on to be elected chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, and Pelosi, of course, would assume the speakership
(pg 284)

What is it about Grisham that makes her think it’s rational to protect an abuser but causes her to ignore her sworn duty to protect the nation? Was her allegiance somehow transformed?

For that matter, is the entire Democrat party suffering from Stockholm Syndrome?

When Control is Threatened

there are many ways to handle it.

I’ve been reading Luke Rosiak’s “Obstruction of Justice”.

To be honest, compared to George Webb’s fast break metadata based investigation of the Congressional spy/criminal Imran Awan who was deeply involved with the democrat party and protected by the republican leadership, reading “Obstruction of Justice” is like trudging through shallow quicksand after a spin in a Lamborghini.

The only reason I keep going back to it is for the occasional diamond of insight Rosiak provides whether it’s intended or not.

Rosiak mostly treads lightly as he lays out his story but he can throw off his restraints; in later chapters he almost approaches, what I think for him would be, reckless abandon. As a former investigator for the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee the naïve crystal he filtered much of his scrutiny through early in the book brings the term sophistry to mind.

The indisputable departure from his disappointingly vague account of a story that thousands of shocked and enraged people are already familiar with through Webb’s dogged efforts struck me as notable and worthy of mention.

First some background.

Awan’s legal team from Wasserman Schultz’s Miami area mentioned on pages 171/172 of Obstruction of Justice included Chris Gowen and Jesse Winograd. Winograd is an espionage law specialist and Gowen followed Bill and Hillery Clinton as a personal aide from Hillery’s senate office to her 2008 presidential campaign and the Clinton Foundation.

Gowan described Imran’s arrest as “clearly a right-wing media-driven prosecution by a United States Attorney’s Office that wants to prosecute people for working while Muslim”. (pg 173 Obstruction of Justice).

One of Gowan’s responses to a story Rosiak published stunned Rosiak into realizing something bigger was going on. He began suspecting the defense team and elements of the Justice Department were working together.

Rusiak writes…

I emailed Bill Miller, a former Washington Post reporter who is now the spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s office in Washington, and sent him a detailed outline of what I was writing: that the government had improperly handed over evidence to the defense. Instead of getting a response from Miller designed to ameliorate my concerns, three hours later, I got a response from Gowan.

“I hear you are writing another article about me – I assume you don’t want to fact check it?” Gowan wrote. “From what I hear, you have it totally wrong as usual.” I had not told a soul but Miller about any upcoming story involving Gowen.

I followed up with Miller to ask if prosecutors had provided information about my upcoming story to Gowen. “I’m not going to get into what we do internally,” Miller said. “I communicate with the prosecutors regularly when I get media inquiries.”

I asked Gowan how he got the information. “I have been told by my source on the Hill,” he said. If true, this would imply that prosecutors were leaking to Democrats, who were providing information about an ongoing criminal case to the attorney of a hacking suspect… (pgs199/200 Obstruction of justice)

Making Should I Stay or Should I Go the UNofficial FBI theme song when democrats are involved in crimes against the People

and the republican congressional leaders UNofficial theme song when democrats are making up their defense against such charges

and the main stream media’s official theme song all the time.

Stepping Into A Camouflaged Rabbit Hole

Yesterday a construction work site ‘incident’ caused a boil water advisory for 55,000 customers in Michigan.

Once again, curiosity got the best of me, mostly because the damage was reported to have been caused by a contractor working for ITC Holdings Corp.

Speaking of hidden rabbit holes, Krista Tanner had to at least ask herself once on her second day at the new job what she got herself into.

While I still haven’t learned the identity of the contracted company who didn’t know the location of a 30″ water line and the pumping station it’s connected to that was in the direct vicinity of the dig, I did learn more about ITC Holdings Corp and their Projects and Initiatives. Laudable forward thinking and planning I thought until the rabbit hole swallowed me up this morning.

This morning George Webb spent an information packed ten minutes related to Russia, Whelan, AK-47 manufacturing, Islamic Center of NA and prepositioning military assets. Don’t go away mad, just go to Webb’s youtube. Then argue it’s credibility.

For more background go to https://brassballs.blog.

Consider also the idiocy and mindless drama democrats are constantly serving up.

Could it possibly be a purposeful tactic of distraction as they quietly but aggressively pursue gun control?

After all the decades of the NRA fighting back the arguments about hunting and the National Guard is the militia… what if the original literal meaning of the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, maintaining the security of a free State turns out to be the reason we need our weapons in the 21st Century and they try collecting them six months before the SHTF?

Can we risk ignoring George Webb’s presentation or worse, watching it and then just blowing it off?