While the non-impeachment closed in a cloud of sophomoric democrat UNcertainty-based humour, few people were left glued to C-Span to witness the follow-on attack by the globalist pawns, united as always when they are called to rally ’round their bosses.
On Thursday, December 19, 2019, by a vote of 385 Yeas to 41 Nays, the House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act (H.R. 5430) to approve and implement the USMCA regional integration scheme.
Of those who voted against the sovereignty-crushing regional merger scheme, Representative Justin Amash (I-Mich.) tweeted earlier on Thursday:
President Trump on trade deals:
NAFTA: “the worst Trade Deal ever made”
TPP: “even worse” than NAFTA
USMCA (mostly NAFTA with elements of TPP): “the best and most important trade deal ever made”
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) December 19, 2019
Sound like piling on to you? It is. It’s piling on a mostly UNaware American people.
There are rules laid out in that USMCA scheme that stink of tyranny. Trump isn’t going to be president forever but it doesn’t look like he’s gonna ‘lock them up’, either; you go to the New American link and soon enough the inside of your monitor screen is gonna get wet with democrat drool. You read some of the things they have to say about the likelihood of cutting off our balls.
…Section 102 of the implementing legislation states: “No provision of the USMCA, nor the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance, which is inconsistent with any law of the United States, shall have effect.” However, the whole purpose of the bill is in fact to change U.S. law in order to be in compliance with the USMCA, once the bill is enacted into law. Section 102 of H.R. 5430 read, in part: “Nothing in this Act shall be construed … to amend or modify any law of the United States, or … to limit any authority conferred under any law of the United States, unless specifically provided for in this Act.” (Emphasis added.)
Regarding State law, Section 102 goes on to state, “No State law, or the application thereof, may be declared invalid as to any person or circumstance on the ground that the provision or application is inconsistent with the USMCA, except in an action brought by the United States for the purpose of declaring such law or application invalid.” (Emphasis added.)
In other words, this empowers the federal government to sue states to overturn their laws that conflict with the USMCA. Turning federalism upside down, this language would virtually transform the federal government into an enforcer against the States on behalf of the regional integration scheme…
World Trade Organization is not about gun control, you say? Maybe not yet but you ought to have an idea by now of who they are and what they do.
We won’t have to wonder too much longer about how the UN troops would gain entry into our world. This USMCA is rightly identified as a scheme, that’s for sure.
So let’s step away from the impeachment distraction for awhile and concentrate on providing guidance in huge and frequent measures to the Senate regarding adding some Second Amendment protection in any agreement they make with their globalist friends.